Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00829
Original file (MD04-00829.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD04-00829

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040421. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained representation from American Legion.

Decision


A personal appearance hearing discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050309. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Conduct triable by courts-martial (request for discharge for the good of the service), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as stated

 No issues were submitted by the Applicant.

 Issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (American Legion ):
“ 1. (Equity Issue) This former member opines that mitigating family problems, the death of his Grandfather death and his mother’s grieving, contributed to his misconduct of record.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member requests that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
 _______________________________________________________________________
In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.

The American Legion’s express purpose in providing this issue and any other submittals or evidence filed is to assist this Applicant in the clarification and resolution of the impropriety or inequity raised. To that end, we rest assured that the NDRB’s final decision will reflect sound equitable principles consistent in law, regulation, policy and discretion as promulgated by Title 10, USC, Section 1553, and set forth in Title 32, CFR, Part 724 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D.

This case is now respectfully submitted for deliberation and disposition.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Certificate of Outstanding Support, dtd July 21, 2002
Certificate of Dedicated Service In Music Ministry, dtd April 27, 1997
Letter of Reference from K_ D_, dtd February 25, 2005
Letter of Reference from G_ L. W_ , dtd March 2, 2005
Copy of Meritorious Mast, dtd 10 September, 1990
Copy of Letter from American Legion Representative, R_ D. S_, dtd 11 February 2005



Subsequent to the personal appearance hearing the Applicant provided the following additional document for the Boards’ consideration:

         Letter from BANTEK West Inc, L_ W_, not dated (2 pages)
        

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                881017 - 890904  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890905               Date of Discharge: 920820

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 11 15 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 31

 Highest Rank: LCpl                         MOS: 0311

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.4 (6)                       Conduct: 4.4 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SWASM, JUMA, HSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 14

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Conduct triable by courts-martial (request for discharge for the good of the service), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920205:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement with military/civilian authorities and minor incidents prejudicial to good order and discipline.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

920721:  Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. In the request the Applicant noted that his counsel had fully explained the elements of the offenses for which he was charged and that he understood the elements of the offenses. He further certified a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions and that characterization of service would be under other honorable conditions. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 86: (2 Specifications): 920326-920327 (1day/S); 920505-920519 (14days/S); Article 87, missing movement; Article 92, (2 Specifications), violation of a lawful general order; wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverage in his BEQ room, and disobeying a lawful order from an NCO, Article 134, incapacitated for duty due to overindulgence in intoxicating liquor.

920731:  Applicant signed statement that he did not request treatment for drug/alcohol abuse in conjunction with his discharge.

920807:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division] determined that Applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial.
930720:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number MD92-01893 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

 Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19920820 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The Applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1, an Equity Issue: “This former member opines that mitigating family problems, the death of his grandfather, and his mother’s grieving as contributing to his misconduct of record.” While the Applicant may feel that his family situation was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Issue 2. The Applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 2, an Equity Issue: “This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application.” The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate his misconduct sufficient to warrant an upgrade to his discharge.

For the edification of the Applicant, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of naval service, if he desires further review of his case.









Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 87, missing movement, and UCMJ, Article 92, violation of a lawful general order.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00678

    Original file (MD04-00678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PFC, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. Issues, as stated Issues presented by the Applicant’s American Legion representative supersede those listed on the original application:1 (Equity) Family problems, father’s illness and death, contributed to and mitigate misconduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00511

    Original file (MD04-00511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00511 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040203. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1: The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00566

    Original file (MD02-00566.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00566 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020318, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall change to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Conduct triable by courts-martial (request for discharge for the good of the service), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419 .A general discharge is written “ UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)” (See MCO P1900.16D, page 1-33, effective 27 Jun 89) An...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00269

    Original file (MD03-00269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500849

    Original file (MD0500849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Propriety or Equity Issue(s): The OTH discharge is inequitable in light of the Applicant’s generally honorable service.Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. The Applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500260

    Original file (MD0500260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00200

    Original file (MD04-00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the service characterization received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (For both Issues, please see my letter to Review Board)” ______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00296

    Original file (MD00-00296.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00296 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 2: (EQUITY ISSUE) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00780

    Original file (MD03-00780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. “I am seeking the assistance of the review board for a change in my discharge so that I can get services through the Department of Veteran Affairs for my disabilities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00731

    Original file (MD01-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00731 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010501, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.